[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Should be fixed now.
[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- My patch for PR82099 fixes this one too.
[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a210d404d08e363af4b2e2a60986c3cb08f8ebc5 commit r11-4890-ga210d404d08e363af4b2e2a60986c3cb08f8ebc5 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tue Nov 10 14:57:19 2020 -0500 c++: Add 5 unfixed tests. A couple of dg-ice tests. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/52830 PR c++/88982 PR c++/90799 PR c++/87765 PR c++/89565 * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-52830.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/vt-88982.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction76.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C: New test.
[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, that's standard as long as you provide the bool as an explicit template argument. Deducing it from the function type is the GCC extension.
[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 --- Comment #2 from franwade33 at googlemail dot com --- It throws a different compiler error if you give the template parameter (Move `bool is_noexcept` to the start of the template list and call `is_noexcept_function(foo)`). To my knowledge, this is not a gcc extension (And it works fine in MSVC++ and with clang++). : In substitution of 'template constexpr bool is_noexcept_function(void (*)(Args ...) noexcept (is_noexcept)) [with bool is_noexcept = true; Args = ]': :24:48: required from here :24:48: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:LINE 24 | static_assert(is_noexcept_function(foo)); |^ https://godbolt.org/z/cjhCQp Where the line number is 1238 in gcc 10.0.0, 1241 in gcc 9.1.0, and 1148 in gcc 8.3.0 (It is an ICE in all 3 versions)
[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2019-06-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Deducing the noexcept-specifier this way is non-standard, but supported by GCC so should not give an ICE.
