[Bug c++/91545] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have var_decl in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3852

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91545

--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek  ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Aug 26 14:39:08 2019
New Revision: 274930

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274930=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91545 - ICE in constexpr store evaluation.
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Check FIELD_DECL instead
of DECL_P.

* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr91545.C: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr91545.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug c++/91545] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have var_decl in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3852

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91545

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek  ---
Fixed.

[Bug c++/91545] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have var_decl in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3852

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91545

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |mpolacek at gcc dot 
gnu.org

[Bug c++/91545] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have var_decl in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3852

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91545

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2019-08-26
 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  Known to work||9.2.0
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||10.0

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Confirmed, started with r274671.

Reduced test-case:

$ cat ice.cc
long a[1];
int d, e { e && (a[d] = 0) };

[Bug c++/91545] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have var_decl in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3852

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91545

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |10.0