[Bug c++/91706] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Bug 91706 depends on bug 101078, which changed state. Bug 101078 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Rejected code since r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug c++/91706] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18 commit r12-1543-g6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Wed Jun 16 16:09:59 2021 -0400 c++: static memfn from non-dependent base [PR101078] After my patch for PR91706, or before that with the qualified call, tsubst_baselink returned a BASELINK with BASELINK_BINFO indicating a base of a still-dependent derived class. We need to look up the relevant base binfo in the substituted class. PR c++/101078 PR c++/91706 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.c (tsubst_baselink): Update binfos in non-dependent case. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/template/access39.C: New test.
[Bug c++/91706] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree |ICE: tree check: expected |check: expected class |class 'type', have |'type', have 'exceptional' |'exceptional' (error_mark) |(error_mark) in |in |equate_type_number_to_die, |equate_type_number_to_die, |at dwarf2out.c:5782 |at dwarf2out.c:5782 | --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for 11.2/12 so far. Is there interest in fixing this on the 9/10 branches?