[Bug c++/95094] alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return alignof(referenced_type) as it should by the standard

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
   See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
   ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=88362

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor  ---
See also pr88362 for a related report of an inconsistency in handling
alignas/alignof (both within GCC and between GCC and Clang).

[Bug c++/95094] alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return alignof(referenced_type) as it should by the standard

[sinbal2l at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094

--- Comment #3 from Inbal Levi  ---
Actually, you are right,
I'm currently working on a paper to change it, should have waited for
afterward.
The reason to change it is to align (...) with C behavior.

[Bug c++/95094] alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return alignof(referenced_type) as it should by the standard

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
But this doesn't seem like a very useful behaviour for the extension.

[Bug c++/95094] alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return alignof(referenced_type) as it should by the standard

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  ---
alignof with an expression rather than a type is a GNU extension ...