[Bug c++/96876] missing check for destructibility of base classes in aggregate initialization

2022-02-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96876

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |12.0
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill  ---
Fixed for GCC 12.

[Bug c++/96876] missing check for destructibility of base classes in aggregate initialization

2022-02-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96876

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53cac72cf0821217f99d0640ba72cc2999ec7dc0

commit r12-7117-g53cac72cf0821217f99d0640ba72cc2999ec7dc0
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Fri Feb 4 18:25:51 2022 -0500

c++: cleanup constant-init'd members [PR96876]

This is a case missed by my recent fixes to aggregate initialization and
exception cleanup for PR94041 et al: we also need to clean up members with
constant initialization if initialization of a later member throws.

It also occurs to me that we needn't bother building the cleanups if
-fno-exceptions; build_vec_init already doesn't.

PR c++/96876

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* typeck2.cc (split_nonconstant_init_1): Push cleanups for
preceding members with constant initialization.
(maybe_push_temp_cleanup): Do nothing if -fno-exceptions.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base11.C: New test.
* g++.dg/eh/aggregate2.C: New test.

[Bug c++/96876] missing check for destructibility of base classes in aggregate initialization

2022-01-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96876

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96876] missing check for destructibility of base classes in aggregate initialization

2020-08-31 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96876

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2020-08-31

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek  ---
Confirmed.  Doesn't seem to be a regression.