[Bug c++/99201] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581 since r8-7613-g1456e764105702a0

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

[Bug c++/99201] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581 since r8-7613-g1456e764105702a0

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201

--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c

commit r10-9844-g7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Sun Apr 4 01:01:56 2021 -0400

c++: constexpr if and nested generic lambda [PR99201]

When building up *_EXTRA_ARGS for a constexpr if or pack expansion, we need
to walk into the body of a lambda to find all the local_specializations
that
we need to remember, like we do in find_parameter_packs_r.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

PR c++/99201
* pt.c (class el_data): Add visited field.
(extract_local_specs): Pass it to cp_walk_tree.
(extract_locals_r): Walk into the body of a lambda.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR c++/99201
* g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if-lambda4.C: New test.

[Bug c++/99201] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16581 since r8-7613-g1456e764105702a0

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.