[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo --- ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) . ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.sum:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) ./gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log:PASS: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) It would pass with the latest trunk. (I tested on ppc64le)
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- I am reducing a similar bug via PR 100129, I think this is all GC related which is why header changes and other non-looking changes in the front-end make it come and go.
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- This report no longer matches the current behavior. I see errors for some of the listed tests at 2eff2a3cb521 for cris-elf, but there has also been periods of zero regressions since the report, last known at 13586172d0b7. Closing this one, opening a new one.
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.2|11.3 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2021-06-16 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Confirmed with native x86_64-linux compiler as well. Also reported on power (besides x86_64) so it's likely target-independent: Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C -std=c++2b (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors) https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-June/700795.html
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- This and several other FAILs have re-appeared on master for cris-elf. I think my autotester log entry is to the point: ... 2021-06-15-15:17:36 1de31913d20a (f: 88, p: 46598) *** regress-11 (f: 99, p: 46599), gcc 71790f398e11, cris-elf at 2021-06-15-21:07:02 on pchp3, log at /x/checkout/gcc_latest/logfile.71790f398e11.2021-06-15-21:07:02 --- regress.prev2021-06-15 23:04:22.0 +0200 +++ regress 2021-06-16 05:26:34.662416022 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/pr99425-2_b.X +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/string-1_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-1_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-4_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-5_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-6_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_b.C +g++.sum g++.dg/modules/xtreme-tr1_b.C (No regressions at 1de31913d20a aka. r12-1482 11 regressions as per above at r12-1490) I haven't looked further into the failures.
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target|cris-elf|cris-elf armeb CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I've noticed FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C -std=c++2a (internal compiler error) on armeb (looks OK on arm) on gcc-11 branch. It appeared between r11-8552 and r11-8563.
[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.0|11.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 11.1 has been released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.2.
