[Bug c/14050] [DR289] c99 restrict doesn't work in abs declarator

2009-06-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-06-25 11:10 ---
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14050

[Bug c/14050] [DR289] c99 restrict doesn't work in abs declarator

2007-11-22 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-22 23:12 ---
Subject: Bug 14050

Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Nov 22 23:12:29 2007
New Revision: 130362

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130362
Log:
PR c/14050
* c-decl.c (set_array_declarator_inner): Don't give error for
static or type qualifiers in abstract declarator.  Remove
abstract_p parameter.
* c-tree.h (set_array_declarator_inner): Update prototype.
* c-parser.c (c_parser_direct_declarator_inner): Update call to
set_array_declarator_inner.
* doc/standards.texi: Update for C99 TC3.

testsuite:
* gcc.dg/c99-arraydecl-1.c: Don't expect errors for static or type
qualifiers in abstract declarator.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-decl.c
trunk/gcc/c-parser.c
trunk/gcc/c-tree.h
trunk/gcc/doc/standards.texi
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-arraydecl-1.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14050

[Bug c/14050] [DR289] c99 restrict doesn't work in abs declarator

2006-09-18 Thread neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from neil at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-18 15:13 ---
Confirmed


-- 

neil at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:15:48 |2006-09-18 15:13:12
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14050

[Bug c/14050] [DR289] c99 restrict doesn't work in abs declarator

2005-08-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-31 
19:56 ---
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_289.htm

This was decided that this was a defect at least as far as I can see.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|SUSPENDED   |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2005-07-02 01:57:22 |2005-08-31 19:56:52
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14050