[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- So this was fixed in GCC 5 because it is an exact dup of bug 60139. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60139 ***
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target|x86_64-linux-gnu| Host|x86_64-linux-gnu| Build|x86_64-linux-gnu| --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-22 20:03:11 UTC --- In GCC 4.8, you can use -Wno-error=pedantic for any warning that prints -Wpedantic. However, the testcase here does not because of a bug. I will try to fix the bug, but this part of the C FE is quite complex (and it looks ancient...) -pedantic changes something in a global variable and later the pedwarn is conditional on this global variable, so depending on the testcase, the pedwarn may be conditional or not on -pedantic (without passing the correct OPT_ value). Not fun.
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187 Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skunk at iskunk dot org --- Comment #5 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2011-11-18 20:06:13 UTC --- There is still no way to defang -pedantic warnings with -Werror as of GCC 4.6.1.
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 12:16 --- The PR for (2) is PR 37200. This concerns (1) and (3). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
--- Comment #1 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-08-21 13:26 --- Also -fdiagnostics-show-option doesn't show that the error is coming from -pedantic: $ gcc -Werror -pedantic x.c -c -fdiagnostics-show-option cc1: warnings being treated as errors x.c: In function foo: x.c:10: error: initializer element is not computable at load time x.c:10: error: initializer element is not computable at load time $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.3.1-9' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 --program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --enable-cld --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.1 (Debian 4.3.1-9) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-21 16:12 --- This is confirmed in trunk. Weird because the pedwarn is not conditional on pedantic, so it should be given even without pedantic. This means that -pedantic is changing something at a higher level. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-08-21 16:12:08 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-21 18:04 --- There are several bugs here: 1) -Wno-error=pendatic does not work. But neither does -Werror=pedantic or -no-pedantic, so this is a feature request. We would need to implement -Wpedantic as a synonym of -pedantic. I have been thinking about doing this for a while anyway just for consistency. However, -pedantic-errors is not equivalent to -Werror=pedantic, so not sure in which direction should the inconsistency be solved. 2) The duplicated messages. This seems hard to fix: too many jumps around, too many global variables being used... x.c:10: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time x.c:10: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time 3) -fdiagnostics-show-option does not show [-pedantic]. This is easy to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
