[Bug c/80832] GCC_COLORS

2017-09-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80832

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Why it should be so fine-grained?
As for caret, it is documented what it is elsewhere in the documentation (the ^
character pointing at the source location below the source line), but it
actually changed in later gcc versions (gcc 5 is going out of support RSN),
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Diagnostic-Message-Formatting-Options.html#Diagnostic-Message-Formatting-Options
shows that we now have instead of caret range1 and range2 and there are many
further kinds).

[Bug c/80832] GCC_COLORS

2017-09-11 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80832

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-09-11
 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Jakub can you please explain it?

[Bug c/80832] GCC_COLORS

2017-05-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80832

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||documentation
   Severity|normal  |enhancement