[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.4|12.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- GCC 12.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.5.
[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.3|12.4 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- GCC 12.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.4.
[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.2|12.3 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- GCC 12.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.3.
[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|12.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 12.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.2.
[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Confirmed. Interesting that one needs -save-temps. Likely started with GCC > 11. I compared the simple from the FE with -save-temps (FAILS) and without (OK) the only difference between the two cases is that the temporary numbers are different by two (the numbers are +2 for the case without save temps). That is the same as the difference shown in the report - but not sure how to analyse that further right now ...
[Bug debug/104050] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -std=c++20 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] |'-fcompare-debug' failure |[coroutines]|w/ -std=c++20 -O1 |'-fcompare-debug' failure | |w/ -std=c++20 -O1 | Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2022-01-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed. Interesting that one needs -save-temps. Likely started with GCC 11.