[Bug debug/39267] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gdb testsuite regressions

2009-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-06 08:13 ---
Closing then.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39267

[Bug debug/39267] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gdb testsuite regressions

2009-04-02 Thread jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com 


--- Comment #6 from jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2009-04-02 21:26 
---
No real regressions.  Formally:

+FAIL: gdb.base/stack-checking.exp: continue to breakpoint: breakpoint for big
frame
+FAIL: gdb.base/stack-checking.exp: bt

which is PR middle-end/13757: -fstack-check

In gcc-4.3.2 it had no effect and printed:
warning: frame size too large for reliable stack checking

In gcc 4.5.0 20090328 it produces no warnings and code not shifting down %rsp
and thus crashing under Linux kernel.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39267

[Bug debug/39267] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gdb testsuite regressions

2009-03-31 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|gdb testusite regressions   |[4.4/4.5 Regression] gdb
   ||testsuite regressions
   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39267

[Bug debug/39267] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gdb testsuite regressions

2009-03-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-31 19:08 ---
store.exp is now fixed, what regressions actually remain?


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jan dot kratochvil at redhat
   ||dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39267