[Bug debug/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480 --- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > Not fully fixed yet, the testcase still ICEs with: > -O2 -g -gstatement-frontiers -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining > -fgcse-sm -floop-parallelize-all -fno-tree-loop-im I couldn't make testcase from #c2 to ICE with those, so I've checked out the reported rev. 255766 and reproduced the ICE from that comment. That one is fixed with the same patch as for PR 80463 #c3 and PR 83972.
[Bug debug/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not fully fixed yet, the testcase still ICEs with: -O2 -g -gstatement-frontiers -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fgcse-sm -floop-parallelize-all -fno-tree-loop-im
[Bug debug/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jan 6 07:48:31 2018
New Revision: 256309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256309=gcc=rev
Log:
PR debug/83480
* toplev.c (process_options): Don't enable debug_nonbind_markers_p
by default if flag_selective_schedling{,2}. Formatting fixes.
* gcc.dg/pr83480.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83480.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/toplev.c
[Bug debug/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva --- didn't we print a warning if we found VTA and sel-sched enabled at the same time, too? I guess that might be useful in this case as well. (thanks for taking care of this!)
[Bug debug/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43045 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43045=edit gcc8-pr83480.patch In any case, I think this patch is a small step towards the right direction.
