[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Backported Paul's fix to remaining open branches. Closing. Thanks to everybody!
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f692856517393d60f745f20306173919e18fc71a commit r9-9718-gf692856517393d60f745f20306173919e18fc71a Author: Paul Thomas Date: Tue Apr 20 07:30:07 2021 +0100 Fortran: Fix host associated PDT entity initialization 2021-04-20 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran PR fortran/100110 * trans-decl.c (gfc_get_symbol_decl): Replace test for host association with a check that the current and symbol namespaces are the same. gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/100110 * gfortran.dg/pdt_31.f03: New test. * gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03: Reduce 'builtin_malloc' count from 9 to 8. (cherry picked from commit 67378cd63d62bf0c69e966d1d202a1e586550a68)
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:714b85f6fce0448b9d4d5e5d21152a3478b27422 commit r10-10106-g714b85f6fce0448b9d4d5e5d21152a3478b27422 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Tue Apr 20 07:30:07 2021 +0100 Fortran: Fix host associated PDT entity initialization 2021-04-20 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran PR fortran/100110 * trans-decl.c (gfc_get_symbol_decl): Replace test for host association with a check that the current and symbol namespaces are the same. gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/100110 * gfortran.dg/pdt_31.f03: New test. * gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03: Reduce 'builtin_malloc' count from 9 to 8. (cherry picked from commit 67378cd63d62bf0c69e966d1d202a1e586550a68)
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67378cd63d62bf0c69e966d1d202a1e586550a68 commit r11-8255-g67378cd63d62bf0c69e966d1d202a1e586550a68 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Tue Apr 20 07:30:07 2021 +0100 Fortran: Fix host associated PDT entity initialization [PR99307]. 2021-04-20 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran PR fortran/100110 * trans-decl.c (gfc_get_symbol_decl): Replace test for host association with a check that the current and symbol namespaces are the same. gcc/testsuite/ PR fortran/100110 * gfortran.dg/pdt_31.f03: New test. * gfortran.dg/pdt_26.f03: Reduce 'builtin_malloc' count from 9 to 8.
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 50628 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50628=edit Fix for the PR As I thought, the fix is trivial. Paul
[Bug fortran/100110] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with global variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2021-04-19 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Xiao, Thank you for this report. I admit that the implementation of PDTs in gfortran is broken. I didn't realise quite how broken it is:-( Making 'obj' allocatable and allocating it produces the expected result. I had planned that once gcc-11 is released, I would turn my attention to PDTs. This one, I suspect, is such a low hanging fruit, that I will give it attention now. Best regards Paul
