[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2023-07-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Steve correctly noted in pr105526#c5 that his patch provides parsing of
the form-team-spec-list, although it will only emit a sorry-type error
message for a not implemented feature, instead of a syntax error.

Reopening, so that his patch won't be lost.

This PR might be referenced in a suitable coarray meta-bug.

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2023-07-07 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Dup of pr105526.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105526 ***

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2023-07-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl  ---
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:34:02PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796
> 
> Jerry DeLisle  changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
> This appears to be fixed on trunk. Can we close it?
> 

Yes.  Likely fixed by 

2022-05-10  Harald Anlauf  

PR fortran/105526
* resolve.cc (check_team): New.
(gfc_resolve_code): Add checks for arguments to coarray intrinsics
FORM TEAM, CHANGE TEAM, and SYNC TEAM.

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2023-07-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

Jerry DeLisle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
This appears to be fixed on trunk. Can we close it?

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2023-05-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> Comment on attachment 52046 [details]
> New diff
> 
> This replaces the first diff, which was prematurely created.

The 'new diff' patch still rejects both z1.f90 and z2.f90.

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2021-12-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment on attachment 52046
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52046
New diff

This replaces the first diff, which was prematurely created.

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2021-12-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52046
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52046=edit
New diff

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2021-12-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52045
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52045=edit
Check FORM TEAM

The requirements on parsing of FORM TEAM are not checked.  The attached
patch checks TEAM_NUMBER and TEAM.  The optional form-team-spec-list is
currently not implemented in gfortran. Add a PSA to recruit new contributors.

[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1

2021-12-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||damian at sourceryinstitute 
dot or
   ||g, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed||2021-12-22
Summary|ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val,   |ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val,
   |at  |at
   |fortran/trans-expr.c:9446   |fortran/trans-expr.c:9446
   ||since
   ||r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Started with r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1.