[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Steve correctly noted in pr105526#c5 that his patch provides parsing of the form-team-spec-list, although it will only emit a sorry-type error message for a not implemented feature, instead of a syntax error. Reopening, so that his patch won't be lost. This PR might be referenced in a suitable coarray meta-bug.
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Dup of pr105526. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105526 ***
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:34:02PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 > > Jerry DeLisle changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- > This appears to be fixed on trunk. Can we close it? > Yes. Likely fixed by 2022-05-10 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/105526 * resolve.cc (check_team): New. (gfc_resolve_code): Add checks for arguments to coarray intrinsics FORM TEAM, CHANGE TEAM, and SYNC TEAM.
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- This appears to be fixed on trunk. Can we close it?
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 52046 [details] > New diff > > This replaces the first diff, which was prematurely created. The 'new diff' patch still rejects both z1.f90 and z2.f90.
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 52046 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52046 New diff This replaces the first diff, which was prematurely created.
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52046 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52046=edit New diff
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 52045 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52045=edit Check FORM TEAM The requirements on parsing of FORM TEAM are not checked. The attached patch checks TEAM_NUMBER and TEAM. The optional form-team-spec-list is currently not implemented in gfortran. Add a PSA to recruit new contributors.
[Bug fortran/103796] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 since r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103796 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or ||g, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2021-12-22 Summary|ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, |ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, |at |at |fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 |fortran/trans-expr.c:9446 ||since ||r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r8-6395-gf8862a1b2afad9d1.