[Bug fortran/20224] gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program

[tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-03 
07:04 ---
Resolving as WONTFIX, as agreed.  There realy isn't a good reason
to support this.

Thomas

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20224

[Bug fortran/20224] gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-27 18:32 
---
Downgrading this to enhancement. 27 years of this not being allowed are a long 
time.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20224

[Bug fortran/20224] gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program

[kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-27 19:49 
---
This is not an enhancement and should be given the WONTFIX status.
Re-read the excerpt from the F77 standard that I quoted.  If it
is not an outright error, then consider the implications that 
this so-called enhancement will have on optimizing DO-loops.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20224

[Bug fortran/20224] gfortran - flags error on strange, but correct f66 program

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-27 
00:10 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 Here's a little more info from the F77 standard, Appendix A.
Hmm, people still have fortran 66 code floating around.

/me hides

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

Summary|gfortran - flags error on   |gfortran - flags error on
   |strange, but correct f77|strange, but correct f66
   |program |program


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20224