[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2014-02-16 Thread jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060

Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jackie.rosen at hushmail dot 
com

--- Comment #18 from Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.


[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2007-01-25 Thread dmarkman at mac dot com


--- Comment #16 from dmarkman at mac dot com  2007-01-26 01:05 ---
it looks like that suggested code doesn't work for x86_64 platform. I changed
ADDR declaration to
INTEGER *8 and gfortran -m64 percentval.f returns the following errors:
CALL SUB1( %VAL( ADDR ), SIZE )   
 1
Error: Kind of by-value argument at (1) is larger than default kind
I did it on Mac OS X 10.4.8 and with gcc 4.2
but I guess it could work on Leopard 10.5 but I didn't check it


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2007-01-25 Thread dmarkman at mac dot com


--- Comment #17 from dmarkman at mac dot com  2007-01-26 01:45 ---
after looking at the gcc/fortran/trans_types.c I tried to use
-fdefault-integer-8 switch
and everything was fine


-- 

dmarkman at mac dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dmarkman at mac dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2007-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2007-01-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-06 14:13 ---
Subject: Bug 23060

Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan  6 14:13:20 2007
New Revision: 120525

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120525
Log:
2007-01-06  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug fixes from trunk

PR fortran/30034
* resolve.c (resolve_formal_arglist): Exclude the test for
pointers and procedures for subroutine arguments as well as
functions.

PR fortran/30237
* intrinsic.c (remove_nullargs): Do not pass up arguments with
a label. If the actual has a label and the formal has a type
then emit an error.

PR fortran/25135
* module.c (load_generic_interfaces): If the symbol is present
and is not generic it is ambiguous.

PR fortran/23060
* intrinsic.c (compare_actual_formal ): Distinguish argument
list functions from keywords.
* intrinsic.c (sort_actual): If formal is NULL, the presence of
an argument list function actual is an error.
* trans-expr.c (conv_arglist_function) : New function to
implement argument list functions %VAL, %REF and %LOC.
(gfc_conv_function_call): Call it.
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Add arg ptype and check
argument list functions.
(resolve_function, resolve_call): Set value of ptype before
calls to resolve_actual_arglist.
* primary.c (match_arg_list_function): New function.
(gfc_match_actual_arglist): Call it before trying for a
keyword argument.

PR fortran/27900
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If all else fails and a
procedure actual argument has no type, see if a specific
intrinsic matches.

PR fortran/24325
* resolve.c (resolve_function): If the function reference is
FL_VARIABLE this is an error.

2007-01-06  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR fortran/30034
* gfortran.dg/pure_formal_proc_1.f90: New test.

PR fortran/30237
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_3.f90: New test.

PR fortran/25135
* gfortran.dg/generic_11.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/interface_7.f90: Remove name clash between module
name and procedure 'x' referenced in the interface.

PR fortran/23060
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c: Called by c_by_val_1.f.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f: New test.

PR fortran/27900
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90: New test.

PR fortran/24325
* gfortran.dg/func_decl_3.f90: New test.


Added:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_decl_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_11.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pure_formal_proc_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/primary.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dummy_procedure_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_7.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2007-01-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-06 14:17 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2006-12-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-31 06:55 ---
Subject: Bug 23060

Author: pault
Date: Sun Dec 31 06:55:16 2006
New Revision: 120295

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120295
Log:
2006-12-31  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR fortran/23060
* intrinsic.c (compare_actual_formal ): Distinguish argument
list functions from keywords.
* intrinsic.c (sort_actual): If formal is NULL, the presence of
an argument list function actual is an error.
* trans-expr.c (conv_arglist_function) : New function to
implement argument list functions %VAL, %REF and %LOC.
(gfc_conv_function_call): Call it.
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Add arg ptype and check
argument list functions.
(resolve_function, resolve_call): Set value of ptype before
calls to resolve_actual_arglist.
* primary.c (match_arg_list_function): New function.
(gfc_match_actual_arglist): Call it before trying for a
keyword argument.

2006-12-31  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR fortran/23060
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c: Called by c_by_val_1.f.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/char_length_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2006-12-29 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org


--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2006-12-29 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR23060

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01834.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2006-11-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-14 10:16 ---
A long overdue patch for this will be submitted in the next 24hours.

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-11-03 14:11:48 |2006-11-14 10:16:44
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060



[Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented

2006-11-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-03 14:11 
---
Adding %REF and %DESCR to the summary. Documentation available here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Functions-and-Subroutines.html


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2006-09-28 07:58:23 |2006-11-03 14:11:48
   date||
Summary|%VAL construct not  |%VAL, %REF and %DESCR
   |implemented |constructs not implemented


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060