[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-09 23:17 ---
Fixed on 4.2: svn 118628.


-- 

brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com]

--- Comment #7 from brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com  2006-11-07 
04:28 ---
Patch posted for 4.2 but not yet approved:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00150.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |brooks at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-11-02 14:01:54 |2006-11-07 04:33:24
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-05 21:31 ---
I don't know why I assigned this to myself.  Brooks has
already fixed this.

Unassigning myself.


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
   |org |dot org
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-03 14:14 
---
Commited to mainline as revision 118450. Maybe we want to include this into 4.2
before 4.2.0 is released? I think that would be the best thing to do; opinions?


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Keywords||patch
  Known to fail||4.1.2 4.2.0
  Known to work||4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-03 16:12 
---
I agree and already tested for Brooks on 4.2 last night.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-11-02 14:01:54
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-02 14:34 
---
Some incomplete patch proposals here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00825.html and there:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00017.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com]

--- Comment #2 from brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com  2006-11-03 
02:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=12541)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12541action=view)
Proposed patch including testsuite changes

I attempted to send this to the list, but I'm not sure if it went through. 
Thus, posting it here; the following text had been included in the email:

Steve Kargl wrote:
 I have stated more than once THE TRIVIAL FIX DOES NOT WORK.
 It causes REGRESSIONS in the gfortran testsuite.  If someone
 wants to fix whatever is causing the regressions, I'll be more
 than happy to commit the patch.

The attached only-slightly-less-trivial patch should fix the 
regressions, although I have not yet tested it to confirm that.

Since my build machine is currently occupied with running CFD 
calculations for my dissertation, would you mind regtesting it?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689

[Bug fortran/29689] gfortran should use g77-compatible format for error message

[jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-03 04:07 
---
I will give it a spin


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29689