[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-05 09:36 ---
I have just posted a patch, so I had better take the PR on!

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00027.html

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-06-13 20:51:44 |2008-02-05 09:36:48
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315



[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-05 11:17 ---
Subject: Bug 32315

Author: pault
Date: Tue Feb  5 11:16:33 2008
New Revision: 132113

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132113
Log:
2008-02-05  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR fortran/32315
* data.c (gfc_assign_data_value): Add bounds check for array
references.

2008-02-05  Paul Thomas  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR fortran/32315
* gfortran.dg/data_bounds_1.f90: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/data_bounds_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/data.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315



[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-02-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-05 13:06 ---
Fixed on trunk

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315



[Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77]

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-20 10:48 ---
This is a regression vs. g77:

$ cat foo.f 
  program chkdata
  character*20 string(4)
  data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
  write(*,*) string
  end
$ g77 foo.f
foo.f: In program `chkdata':
foo.f:3: 
 data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
^
Attempt to specify second initial value for `string' at (^)

$ cat bar.f
  program chkdata
  character*20 string(4)
  data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
  write(*,*) string
  end
$ g77 bar.f
Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at
(1)
Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at
(1)
bar.f: In program `chkdata':
bar.f:3: 
 data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
  ^
Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^)
Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at
(1)
bar.f:3: 
 data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
   ^
Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^)
Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at
(1)
bar.f:3: 
 data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
^
Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^)
bar.f:3: 
 data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' /
 ^
Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^)
$ 


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
Summary|DATA with implied-do: Bounds|DATA with implied-do: Bounds
   |checks missing  |checks missing [regression
   ||vs. g77]


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315