[Bug fortran/40839] gfortran segmentation fault when a unit number is missing
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 20:56 --- Can this PR be closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839
[Bug fortran/40839] gfortran segmentation fault when a unit number is missing
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 21:12 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839
[Bug fortran/40839] gfortran segmentation fault when a unit number is missing
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 16:29 --- Created an attachment (id=18245) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18245action=view) gcc45-pr40839.patch Patch I'm going to test. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839
[Bug fortran/40839] gfortran segmentation fault when a unit number is missing
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 18:09 --- Subject: Bug 40839 Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 23 18:09:43 2009 New Revision: 150021 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150021 Log: PR fortran/40839 * io.c (gfc_resolve_dt): Add LOC argument. Fail if dt-io_unit is NULL. Return FAILURE after issuing error about negative UNIT number. (match_io_element): Don't segfault if current_dt-io_unit is NULL. * gfortran.h (gfc_resolve_dt): Adjust prototype. * resolve.c (resolve_code): Adjust caller. * gfortran.dg/pr40839.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr40839.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839