[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Bill Long changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #11 from Bill Long --- With 10.2.0 there is still no error message for the invalid use of A in a private() clause of the OpenMP directive.
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Relate to/duplicate of pr38724? Marked as duplicate of pr38724. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38724 ***
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Relate to/duplicate of pr38724?
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 --- Comment #8 from Bill Long longb at cray dot com 2010-12-27 01:42:20 UTC --- I am out of the office until Monday, January 3, 2011. Send technical questions to spsl...@cray.com.
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 19:50 --- (In reply to comment #5) I tried 4.4.2 and do not any longer see the segfault on the Cray XT system. This PR can thus be closed? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #7 from longb at cray dot com 2010-05-07 22:06 --- The original problem reported in the Description concerned a missing error message. So, fixing the segfault (while an excellent situation) does not address the original issue. My 2 cents is this is not ready to close yet. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #5 from longb at cray dot com 2009-11-13 22:19 --- I tried 4.4.2 and do not any longer see the segfault on the Cray XT system. I suspect this was fixed by addressing the problem noted in Comment #3. The original problem of not issuing the error message at compile time remains. This (correct) comment in Comment #5: --- However, I somehow read the standard differently such that already the PRIVATE(J) is invalid. --- focuses on the actual issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 12:20 --- I certainly can't reproduce any kind of segfault with this. And, it is unclear to me whether this restriction (why it is there at all, doesn't make much sense) is meant just for statement functions referenced within the omp region, or any. Say is: integer :: a, st_func st_func () = a !$omp parallel private (a) a = 1 !$omp end parallel end also supposed to be invalid? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #2 from longb at cray dot com 2009-07-28 13:47 --- The text at [75:19-20] of the OpenMP 2.5 standard, May 2008, says: Variables that appear in namelist statements, in variable format expressions, and in Fortran expressions for statement function definitions, may not appear in a private clause. So the example in Comment #1 looks invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-28 14:34 --- (In reply to comment #1) I certainly can't reproduce any kind of segfault with this. It could be that it segfaults for Bill because 'ftn' adds -static to the compiler options, but doesn't link libpthread with '-Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive' (see PR39176). Certainly, this happened in the past on the XT5. It is something Bill could check on the Cray :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 14:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) I certainly can't reproduce any kind of segfault with this. Neither can I. Regarding both examples (comment 0 and comment 1), ifort 11.1 happily accepts both. I am not sure whether it is the correct interpretation according the standard, but http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxpcomp/v9v111/topic/com.ibm.xlf111.linux.doc/xlfopg/smpdirclauses.htm has: The following example demonstrates the proper use of a PRIVATE variable that is used to define a statement function. A commented line shows the invalid use. Since J appears in a statement function, the statement function cannot be referenced within the parallel construct for which J is PRIVATE. INTEGER :: ARR(10), J = 17 ISTFNC() = J !$OMP PARALLEL DO PRIVATE(J) DO I = 1, 10 J=I ARR(I) = J ! ARR(I) = ISTFNC() **ERROR** A reference to ISTFNC would ! make the PRIVATE(J) clause ! invalid. END DO PRINT *, ARR END However, I somehow read the standard differently such that already the PRIVATE(J) is invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||openmp Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-07-27 22:47:35 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
