[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 13:12 --- Different libc, different behavior on double-free -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-27 11:45 --- > Works for me on FreeBSD. Is anyone understanding why? valgrind gives: ==77290== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] ==77290==at 0x167FB: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:323) ==77290==by 0x2EAE: MAIN__ (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290==by 0x2F0F: main (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290== Address 0x3e15c0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd ==77290==at 0x167FB: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:323) ==77290==by 0x2E53: MAIN__ (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290==by 0x2F0F: main (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290== ==77290== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==77290== malloc/free: in use at exit: 448 bytes in 11 blocks. ==77290== malloc/free: 30 allocs, 20 frees, 3,482 bytes allocated. ==77290== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==77290== searching for pointers to 11 not-freed blocks. ==77290== checked 833,028 bytes. ==77290== ==77290== ==77290== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 4 ==77290==at 0x15516: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:193) ==77290==by 0x257B: MAIN__ (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290==by 0x2F0F: main (in ./pr41478.ex) ==77290== ==77290== LEAK SUMMARY: ==77290==definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks. ==77290==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==77290== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==77290==still reachable: 444 bytes in 10 blocks. ==77290== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==77290== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==77290== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 10:36 --- Confirmed on i?86-linux. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|i386-32bit, MAC OS X Leopard| GCC host triplet|i386-32bit, MAC OS X Leopard| GCC target triplet|i386-32bit, MAC OS X Leopard| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-27 09:59 --- I also see it on *-apple-darwin9 gcc 4.2.4, 4.3.4, 4.4.1, and trunk. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 00:39 --- I can reproduce this on 4.3.3 and 4.5.0 r151904. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-27 00:39:22 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-26 21:15 --- Works for me on FreeBSD. REMOVE:kargl[201] cd tmp REMOVE:kargl[202] setenv MALLOC_OPTIONS AJ REMOVE:kargl[203] gfc4x -o z asd.f90 REMOVE:kargl[204] ./z array1: 0 0 array2: 1 2 pack array2(2) into array1: array1: 2 0 -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|function "pack" causes |function "pack" causes |double free violation |double free violation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
[Bug fortran/41478] function "pack" causes double free violation
--- Comment #1 from reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de 2009-09-26 20:06 --- Created an attachment (id=18660) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18660&action=view) Test code triggering the runtime error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41478
