[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2011-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jan.rauberg at gmx dot de

--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05 
16:49:54 UTC ---
*** Bug 47175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 
09:30:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 Last patch:
   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html

Review comments by Ian Taylor were:
* More macros now refer to magic variables which must be in scope when
  the macro is used, namely pfile and iso.

* Code in the generic backend is now calling cpp_define, which is in
  libcpp.  This was not the case before.  It does not seem appropriate
  for languages like Java and Ada which do not use the C preprocessor at
  all.

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-11-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-07 
17:07:00 UTC ---
Last patch:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-10-07 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch

--- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
2010-10-07 10:50:48 UTC ---
Complete patch submitted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00566.html

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-10-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||longb at cray dot com

--- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
2010-10-03 12:01:50 UTC ---
*** Bug 42042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-09-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-09-30 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

--- Comment #8 from nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-09-30 
18:47:04 UTC ---
This bug is listed as NEW, not ASSIGNED, but it's set to be assigned to FX. 
Can the status be updated to ASSIGNED?

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-09-30 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

2010-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954

Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|[4.5 regression]|[4.5/4.6 regression]
   |TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS   |TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS
   |issues with gfortran|issues with gfortran