[Bug fortran/43032] FLUSH: Document that it does not call fsync() but fflush()

2010-06-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 12:47 
---
Patch submitted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-06/msg00091.html


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortra
   ||n/2010-06/msg00091.html
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||patch
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-10 12:47:34
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43032

[Bug fortran/43032] FLUSH: Document that it does not call fsync() but fflush()

2010-06-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 19:14 
---
Subject: Bug 43032

Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Jun 10 19:14:12 2010
New Revision: 160568

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160568
Log:
PR fortran/43032
* intrinsic.texi (FLUSH): Note the difference between FLUSH and
POSIX's fsync(), and how to call the latter from Fortran code.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43032

[Bug fortran/43032] FLUSH: Document that it does not call fsync() but fflush()

2010-06-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 19:15 
---
Fixed.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43032