[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still present on master, so no, this bug hasn't spontaneously fixed itself. :-(
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to nightstrike from comment #6) > I still get this on gcc 9.1 You forgot to attach your patch. I have over the years that bugs tend to to spontaneously fix themselves.
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from nightstrike --- I still get this on gcc 9.1
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Bug 49111 depends on bug 64861, which changed state. Bug 64861 Summary: Possible wrong code with BIND(C) and PRIVATE + slightly bogus warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64861 What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 64861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-12-29 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Still present at r206227.
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||craig.powers at gmail dot ||com --- Comment #3 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2012-10-12 20:53:53 UTC --- I see the accessibility denoted by PRIVATE/PUBLIC as conceptually different from the accessibility denoted by BIND(C). In addition to the fact that BIND(C) does not distinguish an import from an export, there is also the consideration that one might wish to hide the C-callable routine (marked with BIND(C)) from other Fortran code by also marking it PRIVATE. I'm in the process of producing a Fortran interface to a C library, and I find that there are some instances where I want to declare the import as PRIVATE and then provide a wrapper routine to take care of the Fortran-to-C stuff that is mechanical e.g. converting a Fortran array. Because my Fortran is a little rusty, and this is my first time making any extended use of the BIND(C) features, the warning made me concerned that I hadn't accomplished what I intended to accomplish. I see this warning as far more likely to be a spurious complaint about valid and intended usage than to be a useful hint about something unintended.
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 --- Comment #1 from John jwmwalrus at gmail dot com 2011-05-22 16:14:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24328 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24328 Test case
[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24328|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 17:04:39 UTC --- Comment on attachment 24328 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24328 Test case (In reply to comment #0) gfortran warns about the private symbol 'strerror' being given a binding label. In sections 5.3.2 and 5.3.5 of the Fortran 2008 standard, there seems to be no restriction between the BIND and PRIVATE attributes ---[...] and therefore no warning should be issued by the gfortran. The Fortran standard only states whether something is valid or not - not whether a compiler should issue a warning or not. The idea is that having PRIVATE (making it inaccessible from outside the module by direct means) and having a C binding (make it available out side) are in a way opposite concepts - and thus possible unintended. However, for an INTERFACE - as opposed to a module procedure - a warning indeed does not make much sense.
