[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2011.07.24 19:03:42 CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 19:03:42 UTC --- Any news here? Set to waiting, to be closed soon if no additional info is provided.
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #12 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-07-24 22:08:42 UTC --- I apologize for not getting back to you. The recommendation was to change to a newer version of the compiler which I did and the problem went away. Hugh McCutchen On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2011.07.24 19:03:42 CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 19:03:42 UTC --- Any news here? Set to waiting, to be closed soon if no additional info is provided.
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #13 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 22:14:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) [...] the problem went away. Closing accordingly.
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-06-04 15:56:35 UTC --- On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:09:06AM +, coml4 at san dot rr.com wrote: I will be happy to update the compiler. I very recently downloaded the latest one that was labeled Stable Release for Mac OS X. Which version do you recommend? I don't use Mac OS X, so I do not know what is available. If you can find it, try a 4.6.1 version.
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-04 16:22:18 UTC --- I don't use Mac OS X ... I do;-) The simplest ways are to build it either with fink ( http://www.finkproject.org/ : gcc4.5.2) or macports ( http://www.macports.org/ : gcc4.5.3 or 4.6 beta).
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 16:29:12 UTC --- What operating system? I get troutmask:sgk[272] gfc43 -c testcfopen.f90 testcfopen.f90:17.33: PRINT '(I10)', file_struct%handle ! I do not know what is in the structure or 1 Error: 'handle' at (1) is not a member of the 'c_ptr' structure with 4.3.6, 4.4.7, 4.5.3, 4.6.1, and 4.7.0 on FreeBSD. If I change handle to a component within FreeBSD's FILE such as _blksize, I get testcfopen.f90:19.27: PRINT '(I10)', file_struct%_blksize 1 Error: Expected structure component name at (1)
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||langton at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 17:07:08 UTC --- I can't reproduce this on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (4.3.3, 4.5.1, 4.6.0, 4.7) or x86_64-apple-darwin10 (4.4.6).
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #3 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-03 17:33:03 UTC --- I apologize for omitting the OS. 27 iMac with i7 processor running OS X 10.6.7. I know the code is bad. It is just that the compiler crashed and requested a bug report. Hugh On Jun 3, 2011, at 9:29 AM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 16:29:12 UTC --- What operating system? I get troutmask:sgk[272] gfc43 -c testcfopen.f90 testcfopen.f90:17.33: PRINT '(I10)', file_struct%handle ! I do not know what is in the structure or 1 Error: 'handle' at (1) is not a member of the 'c_ptr' structure with 4.3.6, 4.4.7, 4.5.3, 4.6.1, and 4.7.0 on FreeBSD. If I change handle to a component within FreeBSD's FILE such as _blksize, I get testcfopen.f90:19.27: PRINT '(I10)', file_struct%_blksize 1 Error: Expected structure component name at (1)
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-03 17:38:13 UTC --- Compiling the code gives the error without crash for me too on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 (trunk and 4.4.4).
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #5 from Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 21:18:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I apologize for omitting the OS. 27 iMac with i7 processor running OS X 10.6.7. I know the code is bad. It is just that the compiler crashed and requested a bug report. I can't reproduce the crash with the current development version built on OS X 10.6.7. Could you post the output you get from running 'gfortran -v'?
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #6 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-03 21:50:43 UTC --- oz-2:gert_library hugh$ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 Configured with: /tmp/gfortran-20090604/ibin/../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --enable-languages=c,fortran --with-gmp=/tmp/gfortran-20090604/gfortran_libs --enable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.5.0 20090604 (experimental) [trunk revision 148180] (GCC) On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:18 PM, langton at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #5 from Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03 21:18:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I apologize for omitting the OS. 27 iMac with i7 processor running OS X 10.6.7. I know the code is bad. It is just that the compiler crashed and requested a bug report. I can't reproduce the crash with the current development version built on OS X 10.6.7. Could you post the output you get from running 'gfortran -v'?
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-06-03 21:59:43 UTC --- On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +, coml4 at san dot rr.com wrote: gcc version 4.5.0 20090604 (experimental) [trunk revision 148180] (GCC) You may be hitting an old bug. 20090604 occurred almost 2 years ago. Can you update your compiler to something a litte more recent?
[Bug fortran/49271] Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #8 from Hugh coml4 at san dot rr.com 2011-06-04 01:08:47 UTC --- I will be happy to update the compiler. I very recently downloaded the latest one that was labeled Stable Release for Mac OS X. Which version do you recommend? Thanks, Hugh McCutchen, Jr. On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:59 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-06-03 21:59:43 UTC --- On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:50:46PM +, coml4 at san dot rr.com wrote: gcc version 4.5.0 20090604 (experimental) [trunk revision 148180] (GCC) You may be hitting an old bug. 20090604 occurred almost 2 years ago. Can you update your compiler to something a litte more recent?
