[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz --- While pr65757 is solved, this still gives an ICE in my environment in combination with a variable : $ cat z1.f90 program test real(16) :: x = 2466840987.123067e0_16 print *, nint(x, 16) end $ gfortran-9-20181021 -c z1.f90 z1.f90:3:0: 3 |print *, nint(x, 16) | internal compiler error: in build_round_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:396 0x702fec build_round_expr ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:396 0x702fec build_fix_expr ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:420 0x7030ca gfc_conv_intrinsic_int ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:550 0x711947 gfc_conv_intrinsic_function(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9202 0x6f7d04 gfc_conv_function_expr ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:6864 0x6ec45a gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7998 0x6f1e05 gfc_conv_expr_reference(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*, bool) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:8143 0x7182b7 gfc_trans_transfer(gfc_code*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2584 0x6bdbc7 trans_code ../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2038 0x715dae build_dt ../../gcc/fortran/trans-io.c:2026 0x6bdba7 trans_code ../../gcc/fortran/trans.c:2010 0x6e51c4 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*) ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:6505 0x673426 translate_all_program_units ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6125 0x673426 gfc_parse_file() ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6328 0x6ba3ff gfc_be_parse_file ../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:204 Works with a parameter/constant instead : $ cat z2.f90 program test real(16), parameter :: x = 2466840987.123067e0_16 print *, nint(x, 16) end $ gfortran-9-20181021 -static-libgfortran z2.f90 $ a.out 2466840987
[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Even though 49627 is older than 65757, the new report actually discusses how to fix the bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65757 ***
[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 dr.robert.kosik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr.robert.kosik at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from dr.robert.kosik at gmail dot com --- This Bug is still open in 2016-01-27 with gfortran 4.8.4 double precision :: X integer(16) :: norm norm = NINT(X,KIND=16) internal compiler error: in build_round_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:394 norm = NINT(X,KIND=16) ^ Please submit a full bug report. It works fine with other types of rounding, i.e., INT(X,16), FLOOR(X,16), CEILING(X,16) compile ok.
[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-01-07 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-07 23:02:06 UTC --- Still here at revision 194996: pr49627.f90: In function 'test14': pr49627.f90:4:0: internal compiler error: in build_round_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:396 print*,NINT(x,16)
[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #2 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-24 20:03:56 UTC --- Fortran bugs are never blockers.
[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24672|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-04 12:12:25 UTC --- Comment on attachment 24672 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24672 very short (5 line) program illlustrating problem Fails with: test14.f90:4:0: internal compiler error: in build_round_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:393 388 if (resprec = LONG_TYPE_SIZE) 389 longlong = false; 390 else if (resprec = LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE) 391 longlong = true; 392 else 393 gcc_unreachable (); I think one needs to replace fn = builtin_decl_for_precision (BUILT_IN_LLROUND, argprec); by something like fn = gfc_builtin_decl_for_float_kind (BUILT_IN_LROUND, ...)
