[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |---
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I agree that this PR can probably be closed. Closing as FIXED. Please file new PR(s) for new issue(s).
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Benson from comment #11) > This was fixed in PR54884 if I remember correctly. Ok, thanks. Then I'm closing this one ...
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson --- (In reply to janus from comment #10) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one > > issue left AFAIU). Also I don't think this is any longer a regression. > > I agree that this PR can probably be closed. > > Except: What happened to the problem of comment 5, i.e. the linking problems > with the FoX library? This is apparently the reason for the 'regression' > tag. I see no follow-ups to this either here or in the mailing list thread. > Has it been fixed? Or was it just false alarm? > > Andrew, can you give as a comment about what happened to the linking problem? This was fixed in PR54884 if I remember correctly.
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abensonca at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one > issue left AFAIU). Also I don't think this is any longer a regression. I agree that this PR can probably be closed. Except: What happened to the problem of comment 5, i.e. the linking problems with the FoX library? This is apparently the reason for the 'regression' tag. I see no follow-ups to this either here or in the mailing list thread. Has it been fixed? Or was it just false alarm? Andrew, can you give as a comment about what happened to the linking problem?
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2013-12-29 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I mark this now as regression in the Fortran front-end to keep better track > of PR middle-end/54224: It seems as if part of the fix has to be done > in the Fortran front-end. > > In this PR, the issue of having a different result with PRIVATE vs. > "PRIVATE :: entry_name" is now fixed. I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one issue left AFAIU). Also I don't think this is any longer a regression.
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.8.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 4.8.1 has been released.
[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-22 14:44:27 UTC --- GCC 4.8.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
