[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 17:06:41 UTC --- resolving as duplicate of PR 52531 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52531 ***
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 10:44:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Note that Fortran 2003 is not supported in OpenMP 3.1. This may change with OpenMP 4, but I'm not sure of that. The OpenMP ARB wasn't as active as I had hoped for, cf. Fortran 2003 in 1.6 Normative References in the OpenMP 4.0 RC, available at http://openmp.org/wp/openmp-specifications/ At a glance, it looks as if almost none of the Fortran 2003 features have been taken care of.
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 --- Comment #6 from Valery Weber valeryweber at hotmail dot com 2012-11-13 16:57:28 UTC --- Dear All I posted a comment on the openmp forum about the f2003 features. Complaining there may help, who knows? Valery
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|openmp directive and|[OOP] openmp directive and |classes |classes --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 14:35:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The following code doesnt compile at all with the lattest gfortran. The problem seems to be in the class definition of the variable this (works fine while declared as type). [...] bug.f90: In function ‘prog’: bug.f90:21:0: error: ‘__vtab_mod_My_t’ not specified in enclosing parallel This is a known problem, see PR 52531. Note that Fortran 2003 is not supported in OpenMP 3.1. This may change with OpenMP 4, but I'm not sure of that.
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 14:47:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Note that Fortran 2003 is not supported in OpenMP 3.1. This may change with OpenMP 4, but I'm not sure of that. Just checked: The public RC at http://openmp.org/wp/openmp-specifications/ says the following: This OpenMP API specification refers to ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004 as Fortran 2003. The following features are not supported: * ... * Polymorphic entities * ... So, it looks like CLASS declarations are still not allowed in OpenMP 4. Too bad!
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 --- Comment #3 from Valery Weber valeryweber at hotmail dot com 2012-11-12 19:18:34 UTC --- Thanks pointing that. Is there any reason for not allowing the classes in openmp? I noticed that other compilers (eg ifort, xlf) can accommodate with this deviation from the standard, is gfortran going in the same direction?
[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 20:02:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks pointing that. Is there any reason for not allowing the classes in openmp? I noticed that other compilers (eg ifort, xlf) can accommodate with this deviation from the standard, is gfortran going in the same direction? Of course there is a good reason. What if a future OpenMP standard introduces classes in manner that conflicts with the way gfortran implements the extension? gfortran would then need an option to toggle between the standard conforming code and the GNU Fortran extension. Which, then, is the default?
