[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107



--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:27:10 UTC ---

This is probably a duplicate of PR 55978 (which, however, was claimed to be due

to r195125, which does not match the interval in comment 0).

[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107



Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:



   What|Removed |Added



   Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107



Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-25 
17:44:18 UTC ---

As said in pr55978 comment #2, the bug is latent on some platforms (e.g.,

darwin) so it may not be triggered by the testsuite and may need to use

valgrind to see it. As any latent bug it may be exposed in the test suite by

unrelated changes (I still don't see it on darwin at r195432). Si I am marking

the PR as a duplicate of pr55978.



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55978 ***