[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
 (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
  Looks similar to PR60495;
 
 Certainly; this _is_ PR60495. :-)

I meant: PR58880

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-04-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks similar to PR60495; the patch there (committed) solved the ICE problem
but the following issue remains (with both PRs): undefined reference to
`__final_a_T2.2437'

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-04-01 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
 Looks similar to PR60495;

Certainly; this _is_ PR60495. :-)

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Indeed, it started with r200954.

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-03-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-03-11 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
 It could be r200954. The backtrace is similar to the one for
 pr58880 (duplicate?).

Very likely.

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-03-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/60495] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1994

2014-03-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2014-03-11
 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE: in fold_convert_loc,   |[4.9 Regression] ICE: in
   |at fold-const.c:1994|fold_convert_loc, at
   ||fold-const.c:1994
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The code compiles with r200946 (2013-07-14), but gives the ICE with r201631
(2013-08-09). It could be r200954. The backtrace is similar to the one for
pr58880 (duplicate?).