[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
This PR has been fixed between revisions r219797 (2015-01-17, ICE) and r219823
(2015-01-18). AFAICT it looks like a duplicate of pr55901 fixed by revision
r219814.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55901 ***

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

Gerhard Steinmetz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
   ||-online.de

--- Comment #7 from Gerhard Steinmetz  
---
On my environment, the examples from comment 0 and comment 4
no longer give an ICE now.

$ gfortran-6 --version
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 6.1.0 20160427 [gcc-6-branch revision 235475]

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Related to, if not duplicate, of pr54070.

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||accepts-invalid,
   ||ice-on-invalid-code

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So it should be rejected without -std=f2003?

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2014-03-18
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Confirmed from 4.6 to trunk. The -cpp option is enough to let the code compile.

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
 So it should be rejected without -std=f2003?

Compiling the code with -std=f2003 -fall-intrinsics gives the ICE (without
-fall-intrinsics there is a link error 

Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
  _abort_, referenced from:

).

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The ICE is in the following subroutine

  SUBROUTINE test_char (n)
INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: n

CHARACTER(LEN=n) :: str

str = foobar
ASSOCIATE (my = str)
END ASSOCIATE
  END SUBROUTINE test_char

[Bug fortran/60561] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721 for gfortran.dg/associate_1.f03

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60561

Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|accepts-invalid,|ice-on-valid-code
   |ice-on-invalid-code |

--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
 So it should be rejected without -std=f2003?

As -std=f2003 is implied by the default -std=gnu: No. In any case, the code in
comment 4 looks valid. - Changed to ice-on-valid-code.