[Bug fortran/65976] gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but does not define it, and it doesn't work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the bug report. Many of the -f* options have a negative form -fno-*. -ffixed-form happens to be one of the options that rejects the negative form.
[Bug fortran/65976] gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but does not define it, and it doesn't work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.2
[Bug fortran/65976] gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but does not define it, and it doesn't work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 2 16:37:35 2015 New Revision: 222725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222725root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-05-02 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/65976 * invoke.texi: Remove 'no-' in '-fno-fixed-form' Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
[Bug fortran/65976] gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but does not define it, and it doesn't work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 2 16:40:18 2015 New Revision: 222726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222726root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-05-02 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/65976 * invoke.texi: Remove 'no-' in '-fno-fixed-form' Modified: branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi