[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2019-03-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com

--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
*** Bug 67123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-11-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #20 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Given that 68108 is marked as fixed and there are no other complaints, I am
closing.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl  ---
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:01:37AM +, juergen.reuter at desy dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
> 
> --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
> Done, 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68108
> 

I may have a patch already written.  Need to run testsuite.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl  ---
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:01:37AM +, juergen.reuter at desy dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
> 
> --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
> Done, 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68108
> 

I may have a patch already written.  Need to run testsuite.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
Done, 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68108

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #15)
> Here it it:
> {{{
> module lexers
>   implicit none
>   private
>   type :: template_t
>  private
>  character(256) :: charset1
>  integer :: len1
>   end type template_t
> 
> contains
> 
>   subroutine match_quoted (tt, s, n)
> type(template_t), intent(in) :: tt
> character(*), intent(in) :: s
> integer, intent(out) :: n
> character(tt%len1) :: ch1
> ch1 = tt%charset1
>   end subroutine match_quoted
> 
> end module lexers
> }}}
> I believe this comes from your commit, so I don't open up a new ticket.
> Would be cool if this can be solved quickly.

I doubt that it is related to Andre's patch as nothing in the above
code uses ALLOCATE.  The error messages is also one that I just
introduced.  So, submit a PR.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #15 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
Here it it:
{{{
module lexers
  implicit none
  private
  type :: template_t
 private
 character(256) :: charset1
 integer :: len1
  end type template_t

contains

  subroutine match_quoted (tt, s, n)
type(template_t), intent(in) :: tt
character(*), intent(in) :: s
integer, intent(out) :: n
character(tt%len1) :: ch1
ch1 = tt%charset1
  end subroutine match_quoted

end module lexers
}}}
I believe this comes from your commit, so I don't open up a new ticket. Would
be cool if this can be solved quickly.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter  ---
These changes seem to break our code. Will provide an example in a minute.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Oct 26 13:03:22 2015
New Revision: 229353

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

2015-10-26  Andre Vehreschild  

PR fortran/66927
* trans-array.c (evaluate_bound): For deferred length arrays get the
bounds directly from the descriptor, i.e., prevent using constant
zero lower bound from the gfc_conv_array_lbound () routine.
(gfc_conv_section_startstride): Hand deferred array status to
evaluate_bound ().
(gfc_conv_expr_descriptor): Same.



Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-25 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm that issue. Don't know how to fix it yet, though. Looks like the
scalarizer is not coping correctly with a AS_DEFERRED array.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu  ---
On Linux/ia32, I got

spawn [open ...]^M
*** Error in `./allocate_with_source_10.exe': free(): invalid next size (fast):
0x09dcebc8 ***

Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.

Backtrace for this error:
#0  0xf7766bdf in ???
#1  0x456e2e68 in ???
#2  0x456e5a03 in ???
#3  0x456e7c5e in ???
#4  0x45658960 in ???
#5  0x4565ebf2 in ???
#6  0x4565a4e3 in ???
#7  0x4565e481 in ???
#8  0x457a35fb in ???
#9  0x4565a4e3 in ???
#10  0x457a36f0 in ???
#11  0x45777192 in ???
#12  0x45777424 in ???
#13  0x45688969 in ???
#14  0x456dbf12 in ???
#15  0x456e4899 in ???
#16  0x456e7f3f in ???
#17  0x804916e in ???
#18  0x80492a2 in ???
#19  0x80492e2 in ???
#20  0x456896f4 in ???
#21  0x8048780 in ???
FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_10.f08   -O0  execution test

GCC is configured with

--prefix=/usr/6.0.0 --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared
--with-demangler-in-ld --enable-libmpx i686-linux --with-fpmath=sse
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java,lto,objc

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-25 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 25 13:02:32 2015
New Revision: 229295

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Added missing testcases of r229294 for patch of
PR fortran/66927.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_10.f08
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_11.f08

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-25 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun Oct 25 12:28:57 2015
New Revision: 229294

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

2015-10-25  Andre Vehreschild  

PR fortran/66927
PR fortran/67044
* trans-array.c (build_array_ref): Modified call to 
gfc_get_class_array_ref to adhere to new interface.
(gfc_conv_expr_descriptor): For one-based arrays that
are filled by a loop starting at one the start index of the
source array has to be mangled into the offset.
* trans-expr.c (gfc_get_class_array_ref): When the tree to get
the _data component is present already, add a way to supply it.
(gfc_copy_class_to_class): Allow to copy to a derived type also.
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_allocate): Do not conv_expr_descriptor
for functions returning a class or derived object. Get the
reference instead.
* trans.h: Interface change of gfc_get_class_array_ref.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2015-10-25  Andre Vehreschild  

PR fortran/66927
PR fortran/67044
* gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_10.f08: New test.
* gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_11.f08: New test.
* gfortran.dg/class_array_15.f03: Changed count of expected
_builtin_frees to 11. One step of temporaries is spared, therefore
the allocatable component of that temporary is not to be freeed.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_array_15.f03

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-06 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More elaborate patch available at:

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-09/msg00142.html

This patch also handles functions for source= that return a class object.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-08-06 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Currently checking whether the bug can be fixed more elegantly.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-07-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unknown |6.0
   Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|[6.0 regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in
   |gfc_conf_procedure_call |gfc_conf_procedure_call