[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

2016-10-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas  ---
I have left this for so long now that it is not worth backporting to 5-branch.

Sorry about that.

Paul

[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

2016-01-30 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091

--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since this is not a regression, I don't see a strong need to backport it. But
if you still want to do it, that's fine with me as well.

[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

2016-01-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> What's the status here? Can this be closed?

Fixed on trunk but not on the gcc-5 branch.

[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

2016-01-30 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Bad result for type-bound   |[OOP] Bad result for
   |procedures returning|type-bound procedures
   |pointers to the intrinsic   |returning pointers to the
   |function ASSOCIATED |intrinsic function
   ||ASSOCIATED

--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What's the status here? Can this be closed?