[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas  ---
Dear Jerry,

Thanks for your confirmation of my feeling about this. I have enough on my
plate as it is!

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

Jerry DeLisle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle  ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> GCC 7.1 has been released.

This is already in 7. I see no need for 6.

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|7.2 |7.3

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|7.2 |7.3

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 7.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 7.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|7.2 |7.3

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 7.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2

--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 7.1 has been released.

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas  ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #12)
> Hi Dominique,
> 
> I was intending to backport to 6-branch but wanted to be sure that no
> nasties come out of the woodwork on trunk.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Paul
> 
> PS Will be back in France late tonight and will start picking up the
> threads again. My Mother's death and funeral have taken up the last 10
> days.
> 
> On 3 November 2016 at 11:15, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
>  wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
> >
> > Dominique d'Humieres  changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> > 
> >  Status|NEW |WAITING
> >
> > --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> > Paul,
> >
> > Are you planning to back port r241450? If no, is there any reason to keep 
> > this
> > PR open?
> >
> > --
> > You are receiving this mail because:
> > You are the assignee for the bug.
> > You reported the bug.

What do you think about backporting? I rather think that it would be safe after
all this time on trunk.

Paul

[Bug fortran/69834] [OOP] Collision in derived type hashes

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||rejects-valid
 CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|Collision in derived type   |[OOP] Collision in derived
   |hashes  |type hashes