[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 --- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Bonsoir Dominique, Je t'en remercie! A petits pas je recommence. Comme Steve Kargl je trouve le git complètement incompréhensible mais je retrouve des recettes avec l'aide de Thomas. J'espère que tu as guéri de votre maladie? Amicalement Paul On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 16:28, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > > Status|WAITING |RESOLVED > Resolution|--- |FIXED > > --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Fixed. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Fixed.
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, can this please be back-ported? Still broken on at least 8. This is not a regression.
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 --- Comment #6 from Neil Carlson --- Yes, can this please be back-ported? Still broken on at least 8.
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This seems fixed on trunk (9.0). Will r265283 be back ported?
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 84539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-10-19 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- pr84539 seems to be a duplicate.
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Oct 18 19:35:34 2018 New Revision: 265283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265283=gcc=rev Log: Fix (re)alloc of polymorphic arrays PR fortran/87625 * trans-array.c (gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs): Detect allocatable polymorphic arrays. PR fortran/87625 * gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_31.f90: New file. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_31.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/87625] [OOP] (re)allocate on assignment fails for polymorphic array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87625
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs() is not working:
/* An allocatable class variable with no reference. */
if (sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS
&& !sym->attr.associate_var
&& CLASS_DATA (sym)->attr.allocatable
&& expr->ref && expr->ref->type == REF_COMPONENT
&& strcmp (expr->ref->u.c.component->name, "_data") == 0
&& expr->ref->next == NULL)
return true;
And we have:
(gdb) p expr1->ts.u.derived->components->attr.allocatable
$19 = 1
(gdb) p *expr1->ref
$23 = {type = REF_ARRAY, u = {ar = {type = AR_FULL, dimen = 1, next = 0x0}
