[Bug fortran/87937] [8 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas  ---
The regression is fixed on 8- and 9-branches.

Paul

[Bug fortran/87937] [8 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

[m.diehl at mpie dot de]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937

Martin Diehl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m.diehl at mpie dot de

--- Comment #15 from Martin Diehl  ---
*** Bug 88412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/87937] [8 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type" and "associate"

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work||8.2.0, 9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression] LHS|[8 Regression] LHS
   |reallocation broken inside  |reallocation broken inside
   |"select type" and   |"select type" and
   |"associate" |"associate"
  Known to fail|8.2.0   |8.2.1

--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> Backporting r264725 on top of the current gcc-8 branch fixes the issue for me.

I changed the summary that the problem is fixed on trunk.