[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-30 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yup, thanks!

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-30 Thread abensonca at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Benson  ---
PR87103 is now resolved, which should also solve this problem.

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-30 Thread law at redhat dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2020-01-30
 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug fortran/93501] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pr93473.f90 ICEs starting with r10-6295

2020-01-29 Thread abensonca at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93501

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Benson  ---
This should be fixed by the patch in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87103#c7