[Bug ipa/105326] aarch64: functions affected by irrelevant function changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105326 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > (In reply to Keiya Nobuta from comment #4) > > Thank you for the information. > > Can it be suppressed by option? > > You can use the noipa function attribute and there's a bunch of -fno-ipa-* > flags (see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html). Some --param options which talk about TU size and documented there: ipa-cp-large-unit-insns inline-unit-growth ipa-cp-unit-growth large-unit-insns
[Bug ipa/105326] aarch64: functions affected by irrelevant function changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105326 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to Keiya Nobuta from comment #4) > Thank you for the information. > Can it be suppressed by option? You can use the noipa function attribute and there's a bunch of -fno-ipa-* flags (see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html).
[Bug ipa/105326] aarch64: functions affected by irrelevant function changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105326 --- Comment #4 from Keiya Nobuta --- Thank you for the information. Can it be suppressed by option?
[Bug ipa/105326] aarch64: functions affected by irrelevant function changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Yes inlining heuristics and many some other ipa based ones are based on the whole translation unit. So changing one minor thing even if it does not look like it would, can change the whole output and such. I don't think this is a bug.
