[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables
--- Comment #4 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-10 08:05 --- Yesterday I filed the suspiciously similar bug 42143 with a really simple test case that fails on gcc 4.4.3 and used to work with gcc 4.2.2. As I wrote in the description for that bug I suspect it's actually a duplicate of this bug but I can't confirm it easily as I don't have binutils sources at hand. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables
--- Comment #5 from michele at focuseek dot com 2010-03-10 08:09 --- (In reply to comment #4) [...] suspiciously similar bug 42143 [...] I meant bug 43302... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables
--- Comment #3 from pjames at avtrex dot com 2010-03-09 21:43 --- I was able to reproduce in Fedora Core 6 and Fedora Core 11 mipsel-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.3.4 20090326 (prerelease) I was able to avoid the problem by first compiling my .java files to .class files, then compiling the .class files to .o files. (compiling straight from .java to .o introduced the dummy symbol) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
[Bug java/42143] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcj creates dummy variables
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:34 --- It works for me with FSF 4.3.4. You might want to report this to Debian. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Target Milestone|--- |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143
