[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

2021-09-15 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm  ---
This is partially implemented by commit
g:332a9f7636ca2a49be3a6ee9c610c5dba9e7e2da.

[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

2019-06-30 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> > > gcc/jit/docs/intro/tutorial04.rst shows an example of debugging,
> > > single-stepping through JIT-generated code in gdb [1].
> > > 
> > > This was all tested by hand.  We don't yet have any automated test 
> > > coverage
> > > to verify that this works.
> > > 
> > > [1]: built HTML version of this currently here:
> > > https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/intro/tutorial04.
> > > html#single-stepping-through-the-generated-code
> > 
> > Are you still working on this?
> 
> Guess not; unassigning

Er, doing it right this time...

[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

2019-03-31 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> > gcc/jit/docs/intro/tutorial04.rst shows an example of debugging,
> > single-stepping through JIT-generated code in gdb [1].
> > 
> > This was all tested by hand.  We don't yet have any automated test coverage
> > to verify that this works.
> > 
> > [1]: built HTML version of this currently here:
> > https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/intro/tutorial04.
> > html#single-stepping-through-the-generated-code
> 
> Are you still working on this?

Guess not; unassigning

[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

2018-10-01 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> gcc/jit/docs/intro/tutorial04.rst shows an example of debugging,
> single-stepping through JIT-generated code in gdb [1].
> 
> This was all tested by hand.  We don't yet have any automated test coverage
> to verify that this works.
> 
> [1]: built HTML version of this currently here:
> https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/libgccjit-api-docs/intro/tutorial04.
> html#single-stepping-through-the-generated-code

Are you still working on this?

[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

2015-02-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2015-02-10
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Confirmed.