[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:40 --- *** Bug 29460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dir at lanl dot gov http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #5 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 15:53 --- powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0 does not come with 64 bit libraries for x-windows - is there some way to turn of the 64 bit branch of the build ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #6 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 16:53 --- if are are using 4.2: http://people.rpath.com/~smithj/gcc-java-nomulti.patch if 4.1.1: http://tinyurl.com/y37csd -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #7 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 18:53 --- I tried installing the patch (the two patch files in comment #6 were identical) into 4.2 , but it failed - [dranta:~/gfortran/gcc/libjava] dir% patch -p2 gcc-java-nomulti.patch patching file configure Hunk #1 succeeded at 4892 (offset 309 lines). patching file configure.ac Hunk #1 succeeded at 209 (offset 36 lines). patching file Makefile.in Hunk #1 succeeded at 7510 with fuzz 1 (offset 1524 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 8896. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #8 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 18:55 --- sorry about that. http://people.rpath.com/~smithj/gcc42-java-nomulti.patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 19:00 --- You may want to try --disable-multilib. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #10 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 19:57 --- What does --disable-multilib do ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:00 --- (In reply to comment #10) What does --disable-multilib do ? It disables all the creation of the multi arch libraries so only the default archeture is created for the libraries. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #12 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 20:03 --- Be that as it may, there are plenty of cases where multilib is desired, just not for java. That should be an option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:10 --- (In reply to comment #12) Be that as it may, there are plenty of cases where multilib is desired, just not for java. That should be an option. Not really, if you don't have the libraries, you should not be building multilib in general anyways. Closing as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #14 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 20:13 --- Java multilib is very difficult to bootstrap. For distros which require a clean bootstrap, yet want multilib support, having it without java is an acceptable compromise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:14 --- (In reply to comment #14) Java multilib is very difficult to bootstrap. For distros which require a clean bootstrap, yet want multilib support, having it without java is an acceptable compromise. Is it? You do first a C/C++ build and then build all the libraries which is needed for libjava and then do a full GCC build and then rebuild the libraries if really needed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #16 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 20:18 --- The patch from comment #8 partly fails on a 4.2 tree created this afternoon - [dranta:~/gfortran/gcc/libjava] dir% patch -p2 gcc42-java-nomulti.patch patching file Makefile.in Hunk #1 FAILED at 9006. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.in.rej patching file configure Hunk #1 succeeded at 4892 (offset 309 lines). patching file configure.ac Hunk #1 succeeded at 209 (offset 36 lines). [dranta:~/gfortran/gcc/libjava] dir% -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #3 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-02-21 20:30 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-08/msg00161.html however, the proposed fix does not help me -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #1 from smithj at rpath dot com 2005-12-21 02:49 --- I have this issue as well, but only with x86_64; x86 configures and compiles fine. x11 and gcc are both built with the same configure options between the archs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
[Bug libgcj/25026] -libXtst not detected [--enable-java-awt=gtk]
--- Comment #2 from smithj at rpath dot com 2005-12-21 02:51 --- oh, and i also get this on 4.0.2, the 4.0 weekly snapshots, and the 4.2 snapshots (sorry, i meant to say that in the first post) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
