[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Should be fixed now.

[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d61c0357ebc771166d5d48743f80aa339b4183dc

commit r13-4574-gd61c0357ebc771166d5d48743f80aa339b4183dc
Author: Jonathan Wakely 
Date:   Thu Dec 8 11:55:31 2022 +

libstdc++: Remove digit separators [PR108015]

These are not valid in C++11 and cause a warning when preprocessing,
even though they're inside a skipped group.

chrono:2436: warning: missing terminating ' character

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

PR libstdc++/108015
* include/std/chrono (hh_mm_ss): Remove digit separators.

[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Warning about this is stupid. We tokenized it successfully, complaining that we
couldn't is unhelpful. Clang and EDG do not warn.

[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Funny I was just looking at the preprocessor PR about tokenizing even inside
`#if 0` yesterday too.

[Bug libstdc++/108015] [13 Regression] 17_intro/headers/c++2011/stdc++_multiple_inclusion.cc failure on i686-linux

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1
   Target Milestone|--- |13.0