[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-11-02 
18:31:15 UTC ---
Looks like this is fixed as part of the constexpr work!

[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-09-07 13:28 
---
By the way the same problem exists for the atomicT* partial specialization.
In general, audit for volatile.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451

[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-07 21:47 ---

sorry p, i have these changes on a branch as part of the constexpr work. will
finish up this week.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451

[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-09-07 22:15 
---
That would be just great!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451

[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-03-19 22:15 
---
Yes. To be clear, Bugzilla isn't the proper tool for this kind of issue: it is
for *bug* tracking - not for managing the development of new projects - and the
whole C++0x is indeed a new project, and an experimental one. Of course, *many*
bits of C++0x are not implemented yet in GCC, implemented incompletely, or not
implemented according to the latest WD, but a Bugzilla entry for each is not
the way we want to go. Thus, please be patient, and at some point somebody will
of course work on this too. You are also welcome to contribute. Thanks.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451

[Bug libstdc++/43451] [C++0x] atomic integral methods missing volatile overloads

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-03-19 22:25 
---
Benjamin, I'm adding you in CC, I don't know which plans do we have wrt to this
issue for 4.5.0...


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bkoz at redhat dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451