[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2014-07-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||stick at gk2 dot sk

--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 61859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2014-06-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2014-06-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||yuecat0 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 61464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-10-01 Thread timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #17 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Now regex is implemented. Should come with GCC 4.9 :)


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-09-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||galens at capaccess dot org

--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 58576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||snypxy at yandex dot com

--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
*** Bug 57984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-06-22 Thread zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Simbaba zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com

--- Comment #14 from Simbaba zhaoxi.du at gmail dot com ---
Most guy need this feature, but just partial implemented. 
However, we have many choice, maybe CLANG or posix, or perl-regex.


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-06-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||andy at aligature dot com

--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 57513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-21 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com

--- Comment #8 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---
Can't Boost people be asked if they'd donate their code?  It is my
understanding that it already happened, for instance for std::shared_ptr.

Note that the current situation, imho, is very bad.  Instead of a compile-time
failure, we get something that behaves more or less randomly at runtime.  This
is really bad for GCC's karma, and shows in way too many StackOverflow
questions for instance.


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-21 Thread rleigh at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #9 from Roger Leigh rleigh at debian dot org ---
It would be better if regex did not exist at all until functional.  If I do
regular autoconf header checks, plus a check to make sure that the needed types
can be instantiated, then these all succeed despite it being broken.  I need to
do additional tests on top of this to actually check if it's truly functional,
and then fall back to boost::regex if not.  No other standard library feature
has (IME) needed such extra checking.

Regards,
Roger


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, we're well aware of all these problems.  What I don't see is anyone
proposing any useful solutions.

If someone sends a patch to remove the regex header *without* removing
exported symbols from libstdc++.so I'll happily review it, but I have other
things to work on.


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-21 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #11 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, I didn't mean to be harsh, and I did try to propose a solution.  I can
easily guess that there is no reason for it to be easy or even possible, but
can't Boost people be asked if they'd contribute?


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's a possibility, but personally I have other things to work on.


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-05-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631



Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 CC||mjnxf at mailinator dot com



--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-05 
15:49:54 UTC ---

*** Bug 57173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-03-28 Thread balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631



Balakrishnan B balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail

   ||dot com



--- Comment #5 from Balakrishnan B balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com 
2013-03-28 15:17:16 UTC ---

Why is the priority just normal? I think its very much needed. I wish there was

a vote button for the issues.


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2013-03-28 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28 
19:21:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 Why is the priority just normal? I think its very much needed. I wish there 
 was
 a vote button for the issues.

A vote button would be useless. What gets implemented does not depend on votes
or wishes, but in someone *really* thinking that it is so needed that they are
willing to implement it themselves or pay someone to implement it.

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2012-06-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
 CC||rleigh at debian dot org
 CC||whatmannerofburgeristhis at
   ||gmail dot com
 CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2012-06-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
 CC||rleigh at debian dot org
 CC||whatmannerofburgeristhis at
   ||gmail dot com
 CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

2012-06-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
 CC||rleigh at debian dot org
 CC||whatmannerofburgeristhis at
   ||gmail dot com
 CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 53630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 52719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 53622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-11 
08:36:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 49870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***