https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62200
Bug ID: 62200
Summary: libstdc++ initialization priority
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vhaisman at gmail dot com
I am trying to initialize my library early using the `init_priority` attribute.
Some paths of my library's initialization might try to print warnings and/or
errors. I have hit a SIGSEGV with the following test case, which uses
std::cerr. According to some, the library should initialize with priority 101.
If this were the case I would expect the test case to work flawlessly.
~~~~
#include <iostream>
struct S1
{
S1() { std::cerr << __FUNCTION__ << "\n"; }
} static s1 __attribute__ ((__init_priority__ (65535/2)));
int
main ()
{
return 0;
}
~~~~
The stack trace is
~~~~
#0 0x00007ffff7b6a559 in std::ostream::sentry::sentry(std::ostream&) ()
from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff7b6ac19 in std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&
std::__ostream_insert<char, std::char_traits<char> >(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*, long)
() from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff7b6b077 in std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&
std::operator<< <std::char_traits<char> >(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*) ()
from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#3 0x000000000040081d in S1::S1 (this=0x601172 <s1>) at test.cxx:5
#4 0x00000000004007d6 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0
(__initialize_p=1, __priority=32767) at test.cxx:6
#5 0x00000000004007eb in _GLOBAL__sub_I.32767_main(void) () at test.cxx:13
#6 0x000000000040087d in __libc_csu_init ()
#7 0x00007ffff7731e55 in __libc_start_main (main=0x40077d <main()>, argc=1,
argv=0x7fffffffe2c8, init=0x400830 <__libc_csu_init>, fini=<optimized out>,
rtld_fini=<optimized out>,
stack_end=0x7fffffffe2b8) at libc-start.c:246
#8 0x00000000004006b9 in _start ()
~~~~
