[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
  Known to fail||5.3.0, 6.1.0

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Fixed in 5.4 and 6.2

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 25 15:44:27 2016
New Revision: 236721

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236721=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71004 fix recursive_directory_iterator default constructor

Backport from mainline
2016-05-09  Jonathan Wakely  

PR libstdc++/71004
* include/experimental/bits/fs_dir.h (recursive_directory_iterator):
Initialize scalar member variables in default constructor.
* testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/
recursive_directory_iterator.cc: Test default construction.

Modified:
branches/gcc-6-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-6-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_dir.h
   
branches/gcc-6-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 25 15:42:45 2016
New Revision: 236712

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236712=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71004 fix recursive_directory_iterator default constructor

Backport from mainline
2016-05-09  Jonathan Wakely  

PR libstdc++/71004
* include/experimental/bits/fs_dir.h (recursive_directory_iterator):
Initialize scalar member variables in default constructor.
* testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/
recursive_directory_iterator.cc: Test default construction.

Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/fs_dir.h
   
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[eric at efcs dot ca]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #6 from Eric Fiselier  ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #1)
> > recursive_directory_iterator it;
> > assert(it.recursion_pending() == false);
> > assert(it.recursion_pending() == true);
> 
> N.B. This test is undefined, those observer functions have preconditions
> that they are not called on the end iterator.

That's true, my mistake.

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon May  9 11:50:01 2016
New Revision: 236028

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236028=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71004 fix recent additions to testcase

PR libstdc++/71004
* testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/
recursive_directory_iterator.cc: Fix test02 to not call member
functions on invalid iterator, and use VERIFY not assert.

Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
   
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
(In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #1)
> recursive_directory_iterator it;
> assert(it.recursion_pending() == false);
> assert(it.recursion_pending() == true);

N.B. This test is undefined, those observer functions have preconditions that
they are not called on the end iterator.

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |5.4

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Only fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon May  9 10:09:37 2016
New Revision: 236023

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236023=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71004 fix recursive_directory_iterator default constructor

PR libstdc++/71004
* include/experimental/bits/fs_dir.h (recursive_directory_iterator):
Initialize scalar member variables in default constructor.
* testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/
recursive_directory_iterator.cc: Teste default construction.

Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_dir.h
   
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2016-05-09
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

[eric at efcs dot ca]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004

--- Comment #1 from Eric Fiselier  ---
Additionally this seems to be affecting the value returned from
"recursion_pending()". The following code compiles and runs without asserting
on my machine.

#include 
#include 

using namespace std::experimental::filesystem;

int main() {
recursive_directory_iterator it;
assert(it.recursion_pending() == false);
assert(it.recursion_pending() == true);
}