[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-12-07 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

David Edelsohn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn  ---
Fixed.

[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-12-07 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn  ---
Author: dje
Date: Thu Dec  7 20:05:59 2017
New Revision: 255483

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255483=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83120
* testsuite/ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc: Add
-ffp-contract=off. Add -ffloat-store for m68* and ia32.
*
testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/17_hyperg/check_value.cc:
Same.


Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc
   
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/17_hyperg/check_value.cc

[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-12-05 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

--- Comment #4 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
In my regen of the testcases, I clobbered some dg-extra-options or something.

[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-11-29 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW this also fails on powerpc64 both LE and BE starting with r254924.

[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-11-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |8.0

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener  ---
Also fails for me on x86_64-linux with -m32:

=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/ ===

# of expected passes12775
# of expected failures  70
# of unsupported tests  256

Running target unix//-m32
FAIL: ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc execution test
FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/17_hyperg/check_value.cc
exec
ution test

=== libstdc++ Summary for unix//-m32 ===

# of expected passes12781
# of unexpected failures2
# of expected failures  70
# of unsupported tests  252


sounds more like a testsuite issue to me not properly allowing for an epsilon
(excess precision, yadda yadda)

[Bug libstdc++/83120] [8 Regression] ext/special_functions/hyperg failure on AIX

2017-11-22 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83120

David Edelsohn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-11-23
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn  ---
Confirmed.