[Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Thanks, Mike. I've added the PR number to the ChangeLog file in
g:b98d3cc5666f36bf3cbeed7cd6a23483cc5e4eca

[Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock

[mac at mcrowe dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542

Mike Crowe  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Mike Crowe  ---
The patches mentioned in comment 2 landed for GCC 11 as
87fce1923fcc8d6ef508500475c149082dc9d338 and
01d412ef36f56c6961858f4d3d395d000e3f1c06 respectively. It seems that I failed
to include the bug number in the commit message. :(

[Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock

[mac at mcrowe dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542

--- Comment #2 from Mike Crowe  ---
An updated version of the fix is available in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-May/050433.html which relies on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-May/050439.html .

[Bug libstdc++/93542] std::future::wait_for should use monotonic clock

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2020-02-02
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |mac at mcrowe dot com
   Target Milestone|--- |11.0
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Confirmed, thanks Mike.